Drawing for OAT SECURE CLOSED LOOP GLUTEN FREE SUPPLY CHAIN GLANBIA

USPTO serial 86432516

OAT SECURE CLOSED LOOP GLUTEN FREE SUPPLY CHAIN GLANBIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OAT SECURE CLOSED LOOP GLUTEN FREE SUPPLY CHAIN GLANBIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina D. Frangiosa

Christina D. Frangiosa Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC50 S. 16th StreetTwo Liberty PlacePhiladelphia, PA 19102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Crushed oats, husked oats, oat flakes, rolled oats, rolled oats and wheat and steel cut oats; all oats being gluten-freeACTIVE—
031Fresh oats, raw oats and unprocessed oats; all oats being gluten-freeACTIVE—
040Oat milling servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 31, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 5, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 17, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 30, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 25, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 7, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 3, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2016UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Mar 31, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 27, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance