USPTO serial 86434029
SL ---
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SL ---?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph G. Curatolo
SALVATORE SIDOTI CURATOLO SIDOTI CO LPA24500 CENTER RIDGE ROAD SUITE 280CLEVELAND, OH 44145-5681UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Sealant compounds for joints | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |