Drawing for INSTANT+

USPTO serial 86434860

INSTANT+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSTANT+?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason Berta

Jason Berta Scientific Games Corporation350 N. ORLEANS, SUITE 2000SCHICAGO, IL 60654UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive game software; computer game software; downloadable computer game software and firmware for games of chanceACTIVE—
041entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing games of chance via the Internet; entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line scratch card electronic gameACTIVE—
042providing non-downloadable, integrated computer software, applications, and firmware that allows for the programming of games of chance; platform as a services (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in offering online lottery and games of chance; computer software design, development and consulting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 4, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 2, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 1, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 1, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 9, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 10, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 10, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 17, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 8, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 6, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2016EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 5, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 4, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 1, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 31, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 12, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance