USPTO serial 86435009
CAPABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARESCA, MEREDITH Z
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAPABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Guido J. Galvez
GUIDO J GALVEZ JOHNS HOPKINS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER100 N CHARLES STFL 5BALTIMORE, MD 21201-3805Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Handyman services that involve home repair and maintenance that are provided as an in-home service to elderly adults to improve their ability to function at home | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Occupational health therapy and nursing services, provided to elderly adults to improve their ability to function at home | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |