Drawing for KOOL TIDY

USPTO serial 86435086

KOOL TIDY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, ANDREA P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KOOL TIDY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexandre A. Montagu

ALEXANDRE A. MONTAGU Montagulaw P C1120 Avenue Of The Americas Fl 4New York, NY 10036-6700UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective cases for earphone cables; cases for electrical or ear phone cables; cases for earphone cables; cases for earphone cables capable of creating electrical charges for charging devices, specially adapted for use with handheld digital electronic devices such as cell phones, tablet computers, mobile gaming devices, MP3 or digital audio playersACTIVE—
016Educational materials, namely, printed teaching manuals in the fields of dog handling, printed handbooks in the fields of dog handling; printed publications, namely, user manuals and printed instructional guides in the fields of dog handling; Pens; Pen holdersACTIVE—
018Dog leashes; Dog training leashes; LuggageACTIVE—
034Cigarette lighters; ash traysACTIVE—
041Training in dog handling; Production of training videos; entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts and webcasts in the fields of dog handlingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 26, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 31, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 9, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 9, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 9, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance