USPTO serial 86435152
HMHS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FARRELL, ANNE M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HMHS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Greenbaum
JOHN A. GREENBAUM HIGHMARK HEALTH1800 CENTER STREETCAMP HILL, PA 17089-0001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing business consultation in the field of electronic processing of health care and health insurance information; computerized database management services; data processing and business information management for insurance companies and health care providers | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | Insurance administration services in the nature of health insurance plan enrollment and administration; electronic processing of health insurance claims and payment data; health care insurance transaction services, namely, eligibility verification, claims processing, claims status information, and statement processing | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Providing information technology consulting; providing custom computer programming, computer network design, computer software development and software design services; providing integration of computer networks and computer systems; rental of space in a computer co-location facility for containerized data centers of others including health insurance companies; outsource service provider in the field of information technology consulting and computer network design for others; electronic data storage and retrieval in the fields of health care and insurance | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2016 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |