Drawing for WHEREABLES

USPTO serial 86435474

WHEREABLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHEREABLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kelly D. Talcott

KELLY D. TALCOTT THE TALCOTT LAW FIRM PC200 SEA CLIFF AVE.#43SEA CLIFF, NY 11579

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Clothing accessories, namely, electronically encoded chips incorporated into wristbands and badges that have GPS technology allowing parents or guardians to track their children or loved ones wearing the devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 7, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 7, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2016NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 19, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 29, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 10, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 1, 2016PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 17, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 15, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance