USPTO serial 86435491
1 TO 1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 1 TO 1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dallas Thomsen
DALLAS THOMSEN SUSSMAN SHANK LLP1000 SW BROADWAY STE 1400PORTLAND, OR 97205-3089UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed coconuts; textured soy protein for use as a meat extender; textured vegetable protein for use as a meat extender, meat substitute or food additive for culinary purposes; soy protein concentrate for use as a food additive for culinary purposes; soup mixes; dried eggs; milk powders; whey; processed edible seeds; processed edible seeds in their shells; potato flakes for mashed potatoes; processed fruits coated in rice, oat flour and oil; gluten-free textured vegetable protein for use as a meat extender or meat substitute; and organic and non-organic soy protein powder for use as a food additive for culinary purposes to accommodate special medical and health conditions; processed beans; gluten free soy lecithin granules for culinary purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Processed bran; processed herbs; spices; grits; processed bulgar wheat; kasha; rice; tapioca; carob powder; wheat germ for human consumption; dried pieces vital wheat gluten; seed meals; nut meals, namely, nut flour; cereals, namely, breakfast cereals; mixes for baked goods, namely, cakes, brownies, pie crust, pizza crust, muffin, biscuit, cookie and bread; pancake and waffle mixes; coconut flour; granolas; corn meals; polentas; couscous; processed oats; oatmeal, brown rice farina; processed organic and non-organic cracked rye; organic and non-organic pumpernickel rye meal; sugars; food starch; baking powder; baking soda; salt; cooking salt; sea salt used as a savory ingredient in food; yeast; rices; blends of processed whole grains used as a cereal or pilaf; popcorn; rolled oats; rolled grains; gluten additives, cream of tartar additives, guar gum and xanthan gum for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring ingredient or filler; gluten-free flours from grains, beans, lentils, roots and tubers, organic and non-organic grains; flax seed meal; processed whole grain teff; teff flour, food starches, baking powder, baking soda, active dry yeast, nutritional large flake yeast, and coconut flour to accommodate special medical and health conditions; flavorings for soups; unpopped popcorn; processed aramanth, barley, buckwheat, corn, farro, freekeh, khorasan wheat, millet, oats, quinoa, rice, rye, sorghum, spelt, teff, triticale, and wheat | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed edible seeds, namely, sesame, sunflower, caraway, chia, flax, poppy, pumpkin, hemp and alfalfa seeds; unprocessed coconut; raw popcorn; unprocessed whole grains for use in food preparation; unprocessed aramanth, barley, buckwheat, corn, farro, freekeh, khorasian wheat, millet, oats, quinoa, rice, rye, sorghum, spelt, teff, triticale, and wheat; gluten-free unprocessed edible seeds to accommodate special medical and health conditions; the aforementioned for culinary use and not taken as a dietary supplement or for medical purposes; unprocessed beans | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |