Drawing for D2

USPTO serial 86435769

D2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with D2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel D. Chapman

DANIEL D. CHAPMAN JACKSON WALKER, LLP112 E PECAN ST STE 2400SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205-1510UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and computer software for use in electronic data recording, namely, computer software which captures, records, and provides underground data during horizontal and directional drilling activities in the oil and gas industry to better identify drilling directionACTIVE—
042Electronic data recording services in the oil and gas industry, namely, the capturing, recording, and provision of underground data during drilling activities to assist others to better identify drilling directionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2016MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 15, 2016ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 14, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 18, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 11, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance