Drawing for INHUMANS

USPTO serial 86435993

INHUMANS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INHUMANS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steve Ackerman

STEVE ACKERMAN THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Applesauce; banana chips; butter or butter substitutes; bases for making milkshakes; cheese and cracker combinations; candied fruit; chocolate milk; chili; dried fruit-based snacks; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; dips; dried fruits; drinking yogurts; eggs; frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; fruit peels and preserves; fruit salads; fruit-based snack food; uncooked hamburger patties; hot dogs; jams; jellies; margarine; marmalades; meats; meat, fish, poultry and game, not live; nut butters; pickles; potato chips; potato salad; potato-based snack foods; poultry; processed, canned, bottled, dried, frozen, cooked, or preserved fruits and vegetables; processed fruits and vegetables; powdered milk; raisins; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; soups; soup mixes; veggie burger patties; yogurtACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 20, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 8, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 31, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 31, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 19, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 29, 2016ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 29, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance