Drawing for LANEIGE ALL LASH

USPTO serial 86436315

LANEIGE ALL LASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LANEIGE ALL LASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Costellia

JEFFREY L. COSTELLIA NIXON PEABODY LLP401 9TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2145UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; Cosmetic preparations for skin care; Solid make-up powder for compacts; Make-up cosmetics; Cosmetic preparations for bath and shower; Non-medicated skin creams; Hair gel; Perfumes; Lavender oil; Hair shampoo; Dentifrices; Cosmetic soaps; Makeup removers; Artificial eyelashes; Adhesives for eyelashes; Removers for eyelashes; Mascara; Eyeliners; Eyeliner pencilsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 17, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 28, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 18, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 18, 2015PBSRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Sep 14, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 13, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 17, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance