Drawing for KAEDAMA

USPTO serial 86437544

KAEDAMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, DONALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAEDAMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan A. LaVine

JORDAN A LAVINE FLASTER GREENBERG P C1600 JFK BLVD FL 2PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2852UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Bar and restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 18, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 18, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 9, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 10, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 2, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 2, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 2, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 2, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 13, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance