Drawing for ALPHA PURE PH8+ PURE FROM THE SOURCE

USPTO serial 86438420

ALPHA PURE PH8+ PURE FROM THE SOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALPHA PURE PH8+ PURE FROM THE SOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric O. Haugen

ERIC O. HAUGEN HAUGEN LAW FIRM PLLP1130 TCF Tower121 S. Eighth StreetMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2841

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Bottled natural spring drinking waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 10, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 21, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 2, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 2, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 2, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 1, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2014MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance