USPTO serial 86438849
PGS PIPE GROOVED SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PGS PIPE GROOVED SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARRY TAPIAS
HARRY TAPIAS LOIGICA P.A.78 SW 7th St, Suite 6142MIAMI, FL 33130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Branching tubes of metal for pipelines; Metal pipe clips; Metal pipe collars; Metal pipe connectors; Metal pipe couplings and joints; Metal pipe fittings for compressed air pipes; Metal pipes; Metal pipes and tubes; Metal pipes for liquid and gas transfer; Metal sewer pipes; Metal tubes; Metal tubes for industrial use; Metal tubing; Metal water pipes; Metallic pipes; Metallic pipes and tubes; Pipe tubes of metal; Pipes and tubes of metal; Steel pipes; Steel pipes and tubes; Underdrainage pipes of metal; Water-pipe valves of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PGS PIPE GROOVED SOLUTIONS SAS CI
- Other trademarks owned by PGS PIPE GROOVED SOLUTIONS SAS CI
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named PGS PIPE GROOVED SOLUTIONS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |