USPTO serial 86438855
BOUNTY FULL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 20, 2016
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BOUNTY FULL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $850
Owner
International Greenhouse Produce, S.A. de C.V.
Culiacan, Sinaloa, MX
Other trademarks owned by International Greenhouse Produce, S.A. de C.V.
International Greenhouse Produce, S.A. de C.V.
Culiacan, Sinaloa, MX
Other trademarks owned by International Greenhouse Produce, S.A. de C.V.
International Greenhouse Produce, S.A. de C.V.
Culiacan, Sinaloa, MX
Other trademarks owned by International Greenhouse Produce, S.A. de C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin R. Young
Justin R. Young DTL Ltd.160 North Wacker DriveCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Fresh cucumbers; Fresh eggplants; Fresh fruits; Fresh peppers; Fresh tomatoes; Fresh vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Greenhouse Produce, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by International Greenhouse Produce, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by International Greenhouse Produce, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named BOUNTY FULL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 10, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | CHPN | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 30, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |