Drawing for ALGAE WAFERS

USPTO serial 86439012

ALGAE WAFERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALGAE WAFERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patchen M. Haggerty

PATCHEN M HAGGERTY PERKINS COIE1201 3RD AVE STE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fish foodACTIVEOct 31, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 12, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 12, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 29, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 19, 2018RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Mar 29, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 9, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 3, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 3, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 5, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 5, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 23, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance