Drawing for TROPICÁLIA

USPTO serial 86439475

TROPICÁLIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TROPICÁLIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore R. Remaklus

THEODORE R REMAKLUS WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP2700 Carew Tower441 Vine StreetCINCINNATI, OH 45202-2814

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, sleepwear, underwear, shirts, pants, jeans, skirts, dresses, shorts, tops, blouses, leggings, tights, jackets, scarves, belts, sweaters, swimwear; headwear; footwearACTIVE—
028Sporting articles, namely, nets for sports; surfboards; appliances for gymnastics; balls for games; bar-bells; body-training apparatus; bags especially designed for skis and surfboardsACTIVE—
035Providing websites featuring business information via the world wide web in the field of tradeshows, exhibitions, expositions, and fairs for commercial and promotional purposes; business management of performing artists; business management of sports people; public relations; organization of fashion shows for promotional purposesACTIVE—
038Communications by computer terminals; transmission of greeting cards online; message sending via a websiteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 6, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 25, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 13, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 29, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 16, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 14, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 14, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 17, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 17, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance