Drawing for DROP BY JAWBONE

USPTO serial 86439811

DROP BY JAWBONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DROP BY JAWBONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer D. Arkowitz,

JENNIFER D ARKOWITZ KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP2 EMBARCADERO CENTER8TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for streaming, broadcasting, and transmitting music; computer hardware and software used for organizing, transmitting, receiving, and reviewing audio files; computer hardware and software for wireless digital content delivery and transmission; computer hardware and software for transmitting, delivering, receiving, processing and streaming digital media, data, music and audio filesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 28, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 28, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 12, 2016EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 10, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 10, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 10, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 23, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 23, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 22, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 22, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 20, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance