USPTO serial 86439893
M.P.I. MY PHONE INCENTIVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M.P.I. MY PHONE INCENTIVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Racine, MN
Racine, MN
Racine, MN
Racine, MN
Spring Valley, MN
Spring Valley, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerry D. Haynes
JERRY D. HAYNES The Law Office Of Jerry D Haynes P A12550 Biscayne Blvd Ste 800North Miami, FL 33181-2545UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | A mobile application used to download rewards and coupons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stowers, Deann Marie
- Other trademarks owned by Stowers, Deann Marie
- Other trademarks owned by Stowers, Dana D.
- Other trademarks owned by Stowers, Dana D.
- Other trademarks owned by Hovey, Brian J.
- Other trademarks owned by Hovey, Brian J.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named M.P.I. MY PHONE INCENTIVES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |