USPTO serial 86440141
BON SUISSE A DELICIOUS WAY TO LIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BON SUISSE A DELICIOUS WAY TO LIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Johnson
MARIA JOHNSON DE NOVO LEGAL PC1926 KELLOGG AVENUESUITE 101CARLSBAD, CA 92008Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Fresh eggs; Frozen non-dairy cream substitute; Milk; Flavored milk; Lactose-free milk; Acidophilus milk; Chocolate milk; Pasteurized liquid egg product; Fat-free non-dairy liquid creamer; Flavored fat-free non-dairy liquid creamer; Yogurt; Cheese; Sour cream; Yogurt drinks; Whipping cream; Half and half; Butter; Cottage cheese; Buttermilk; Frozen french fries; Frozen vegetables; Frozen dinners, namely, frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1992 |
| 030 | Dairy products and frozen dairy products, namely, ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; Ice cream cakes; Ice cream sandwiches; Frozen confections, namely, freezer pops; Frozen confections, namely, freezer bars; Cones for ice cream; Edible ices; Kits comprised of ingredients for making ice cream; Frozen dairy confections; Frozen pizza; Frozen dinners, namely, frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1992 |
| 035 | Wholesale and retail store services featuring food, wholesale distributorship services in the field of food, on-line retail and wholesale store services featuring food, and distributorship services in the field of dairy products, frozen dairy products, ice creams, and food products, such as pizza, frozen vegetables, French fries, frozen foods, branded drinks, juices, and other foods | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 27, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 16, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |