USPTO serial 86440188
RESOLUTION1 PLATFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RESOLUTION1 PLATFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BETHESDA, MD
BETHESDA, MD
Lindon, UT
MENLO PARK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Hill
RICHARD L. HILL DURHAM, JONES, & PINEGAR, P.C.3301 THANKSGIVING WAY STE 400LEHI, UT 84043-4093UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and/or hardware, namely, software and hardware for centralized identification, acquisition, storage, encryption, management, manipulation, joining, analysis and reporting of computer data, computer network data, mobile device data, metadata, files, information and security breach incidents, as well as collection, analysis and monitoring of network traffic, for use in fields of cybersecurity, analytics, computer forensics, e-discovery and litigation; computer software and/or hardware for detecting, reporting, analyzing and eliminating cyber incidents, such as malware, unauthorized software and network attacks; computer software and/or hardware system for identification, acquisition, storage, encryption, management, manipulation, analysis and reporting of computer data and computer network data, metadata, files, information and security breach incidents, for use in security and system intrusion assessment, investigation of damage to or unauthorized use of computer data and files, diagnostics, forensic data investigation, electronic evidence discovery and business loss valuation; computer hardware and/or software for creating searchable databases of information and data and managing storage devices in a networked environment; computer hardware and/or downloadable software for litigation support, namely, collecting, storing, sharing, reviewing, searching, managing, categorizing and coding documents | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consulting services in the field of cybersecurity; Computer services, namely, monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting on the Internet traffic control and content control of the websites of others; computer forensic services; data encryption and encoding services; electronic data storage; development of customized software for others for use in risk assessment, information security, business analysis, computer security and security breach analysis; computer services, namely, on-line scanning, detecting, quarantining and eliminating of viruses, worms, trojans, spyware, adware, malware and unauthorized data and programs on computers and electronic devices; computer diagnostic services; providing an online searchable database in the field of computer forensics, cybersecurity and the elimination of computer viruses | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Legal services, namely, intellectual property consulting services in the field of identification and analytics; litigation support services, namely, conducting electronic legal discovery in the nature of reviewing electronically stored information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuit; litigation support services; providing an online searchable database in the field of litigation support and for collecting, storing, sharing, reviewing, searching, managing, categorizing and coding litigation support documents; monitoring of computer systems for security purposes; providing security assessments of information systems; analyzing and resolving cyber incidents and security breach incidents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FIDELIS CYBERSECURITY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FIDELIS CYBERSECURITY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AccessData Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RESOLUTION1 SECURITY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named RESOLUTION1 PLATFORM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |