Drawing for WHY NOT SOCCER

USPTO serial 86440300

WHY NOT SOCCER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LATTUCA, FRANK J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHY NOT SOCCER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Powers

JAMES A. POWERS LAW OFFICES OF JAMES A. POWERS6808 BRENNON LNCHEVY CHASE, MD 20815-3256UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising, marketing and promotion servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 2, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 21, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 19, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 16, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 13, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 20, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 20, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance