USPTO serial 86440429
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara A. Barakat, Esquire
Barbara A. Barakat, Esquire Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and DorrLLP1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 1660Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation in the field of telecommunications and wide area networks (WAN) management; computer services, namely, web optimization for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications gateway services; electronic streaming and transmission of audio and video messages and images on the internet or an intranet; television transmission services and satellite transmission services; providing computer network access services to others by means of Ethernet services, managed router services and virtual private networks (VPN); providing video, voice and data transmission services via telecommunication hardware and equipment; providing facilities and equipment for video conferencing and telepresence conferencing, and providing facilities and equipment for telecommunication access services, and telecommunications gateway services for the transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet and cloud computing networks, namely, leasing of telecommunication facilities and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, optimizing cloud computing networks in the nature of remote and on-site infrastructure management and monitoring of cloud computing IT and application systems; Technical support services, namely, managing the performance of computing and networking applications, servers, data storage, and communications protocols used in cloud computing networks; Improving, optimizing and accelerating the performance of computing and networking applications, data storage, and communications protocols used in cloud computing networks, namely, updating and maintaining cloud-based computer software and programs; consulting services in the field of cloud computing; technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |