USPTO serial 86440433
RACHAEL RAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RACHAEL RAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robin E. Silverman
ROBIN E. SILVERMAN GOLENBOCK EISEMAN ASSOR BELL & PESKOE711 Third AvenueNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Outdoor furniture; patio furniture; umbrella stands; lawn ornaments of plastic and wood; combination kneeler and seat for gardening; chair pads; shelving and component parts thereof, namely, shelves and brackets sold as a unit; cushions; picture frames; window treatments, namely, nonmetal window trims, interior window blinds, window shades and hardware for window treatments, window blinds and window shades, namely, curtain rods, curtain rings and finials; home organizers and storage products, namely, racks, non-metal hooks, non-metal bins and non-paper containers, shoe organizers, namely, shoe racks and shoe cabinets; pillows; party ornaments of plastic, plaster, wax, wood, acrylic resin or textile; seasonal party decorations of plastic, plaster, wax, wood, acrylic resin or textile; wine racks; pet crates; pet mats; leather furniture; chair covers in the nature of fitted fabric furniture covers; non-metal pet tags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |