Drawing for VIEWSTREAM

USPTO serial 86441089

VIEWSTREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIEWSTREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MORTON J. ROSENBERG

MORTON J. ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CENTER DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043-4178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009VIDEO PROJECTORS; PROJECTOR SCREENS; TELEVISIONS; TELEVISION SCREENS, NAMELY, VIDEO SCREENS; COMPUTER MONITORS; COMPUTER SCREENS; DIGITAL PHOTO FRAME; COMPUTERS; TABLET PC; NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; TELEPHONES; VIDEO TELEPHONES; MOBILE PHONES; ELECTRONIC PENS; ELECTRONIC NOTICE BOARDS, COMPUTER PERIPHERAL DEVICES; DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS FOR DOWNLOADING PHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEOS, TEXT AND MUSIC; PORTABLE MEDIA PLAYERS; SMART PHONES; DIGITAL MEDIA STREAMING DEVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2015ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 24, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 22, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 22, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance