USPTO serial 86441190
FISPRINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FISPRINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carrie L. Kiedrowski
CARRIE L. KIEDROWSKI Jones Day250 Vesey StreetNew York, NY 10281-1047UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Siliconised and separating lacquers in the nature of coatings to be applied on plastic films, paper and textiles; lacquers in the nature of coatings with adhesive, printable, writable, conducting, insulating, absorbing, reflecting and magnetic properties to be applied on plastic films, papers and textiles; transmitting lacquers in the nature of coatings with adhesive, printable, writable, conducting, insulating, absorbing, reflecting and magnetic properties to be applied on plastic films, papers and textiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Magnetic paper and cardboard packaging; plastic films, namely, magnetic films | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper cards, tag labels, blank and printable forms and printing items made from paper and cardboard, namely, cards, labels, forms and banners; glues and adhesives; printed matter, namely, cards, labels, forms and banners; packaging materials made of plastic; siliconised, separating, adhesive, printable, writable, absorbing, reflecting paper and cardboard packaging; self-adhesive papers; silicone coated papers; hot-melt-coated paper; window films for the packaging industry; paper having barrier functions | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Plastic films, plastic films with coating layers, siliconised, separating, adhesive, printable, writable, conducting, insulating, absorbing, reflecting, magnetic and transmitting films for use in the manufacture of industrial products; films having barrier functions for packaging, printable goods, organic electronics, construction, and other industrial use; adhesive film for packaging, printable goods, organic electronics, construction, and other industrial use; hot-melt-coated films for packaging, printable goods, organic electronics, construction, and other industrial use; laminated plastic films for packaging, printable goods, organic electronics, construction, and other industrial use; layered structures of paper and films and/or textiles for packaging, printable goods, organic electronics, construction, and other industrial use; electro-films for packaging, printable goods, organic electronics, construction, and other industrial use; plastic tear-off tapes and masking tapes; conducting and insulating packaging used for packaging, printable goods, organic electronics, construction, and other industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Folien Fischer USA, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Folien Fischer USA, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named FISPRINT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |