USPTO serial 86441886
LINKXTEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LINKXTEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kanata, Ontario, CA
Kanata, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole Linehan
ANNA L KING BANNER & WITCOFF LTD10 SOUTH WACKER DRIVESUITE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless data radio communications systems comprised of transmitters, modems and receivers for use with oil and gas production and distribution, water and wastewater systems and electrical power distribution systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |