USPTO serial 86441956
HANNAH FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HANNAH FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey S. Newman
JEFFREY S. NEWMAN LOGINOV & ASSOCIATES, PLLC214 S MAIN STCONCORD, NH 03301-3419UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dips and salads, namely, Organic hommus products, namely, Classic Organic hommus, Roasted Pepper organic hommus, Single organic hommus; Traditional hommus products, namely, Classic hommus, Baba ghannouj, Red roasted pepper hommus, Roasted pepper w/ mild jalapeno hommus, Roasted garlic hommus, Cilantro lemon hommus, Honey mustard hommus, Sweet Thai chili hommus, Sea salt and rosemary hommus, Spicy hommus, Chipotle hommus, Olive hommus; hommus products, namely, chick pea hommus, roasted pepper hommus, roasted garlic hommus, Skinny spinach and artichoke hommus; Trio hommus products, namely, hommus, Original; Taboule products, namely, Taboule, Greek taboule; All Natural hommus products, namely, Original hommus, Roasted Garlic Hommus, Classic hommus, Roasted red pepper hommus ; Tzatziki Yogurt dip products, namely, Tzatziki, Tzatziki singles, Chipotle tzatziki, Cilantro jalapeno tzatziki, Organic tzatziki; Dip and spread products, namely, Bruschetta toppings, Spinach dip, Roasted Pepper spinach artichoke dip, Olive spread, Sundried tomato and basil feta spread, Garlic and chive feta spread, Roasted pepper salad, Bean relish dip, Carmelized French onion dip; Meat products, namely, Kibbee, Kafta, Chicken salad ranch style | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |