Drawing for VALO

USPTO serial 86442489

VALO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SABLE, ERIC
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VALO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Mello

DAVID M. MELLO ONELLO & MELLO, LLP3 BURLINGTON WOODS DR STE 203BURLINGTON, MA 01803-4514UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cell phone cases; cell phone covers; display screen protectors for providing shade specially adapted to cell phones; display screen shades for glare or privacy protection specifically adapted to electronic devices, namely, cell phones, tablets, laptops, personal digital assistants, electronic book readers, and mobile navigation systemsACTIVEJan 10, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 13, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 13, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 13, 2019IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2019INCSITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE—
Jan 15, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 17, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 23, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 3, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 13, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 1, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 1, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 28, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 15, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 20, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 30, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 11, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2014AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 11, 2014PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance