USPTO serial 86442731
VITASOY GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITASOY GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzanne M. Hengl
SUZANNE M. HENGL BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 44NEW YORK, NY 10112-0015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Savory vegetable pudding consisting in substantial part of soya beans; savory custard made in substantial part of soya beans; tofu, soya bean curd; yogurt, vegetable dips, soya bean-based meat substitutes; sausage substitutes; soya bean extracts for making beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tea, tea drinks, non-medicated herbal tea drinks, coffee drinks, cocoa drinks; preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal bars; cereal bars; pastry and confectionery, namely, confectionery chips for baking, pastilles, confectionery made of sugar; biscuits, cakes, pastries; snack foods; soya bean-based custard; soya bean-based dessert pudding; soya bean-based dressing, namely, salad dressing, coleslaw dressing; soya bean-based desserts; soya bean extracts for use as flavorings for beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Mineral and aerated water; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices, non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages, non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages, non-alcoholic beverages containing vegetable juices, non-alcoholic vegetable extracts used in the preparation of beverages, non-alcoholic vegetable juice beverages; non-alcoholic beverages containing herbal juices, non-alcoholic non-medicinal herbal extracts used in the preparation of beverages, non-alcoholic herbal juice beverages; syrups for making beverages; non-alcoholic carbonated and non-carbonated drinks and beverages consisting primarily of soya beans; non-alcoholic carbonated and non-carbonated drinks and beverages, namely, rice drinks, not being milk substitutes, fruit drinks, distilled drinking water and mineral water; black bean drinks and oat drinks, not for food purposes; syrups and powders for making carbonated and non-carbonated fruit and vegetable drinks and beverages, soft drinks, fruit and vegetable drinks and fruit, vegetable and herbal juices; non-alcoholic carbonated and non-carbonated drinks and beverages consisting primarily of soya beans; non-alcoholic carbonated and non-carbonated drinks and beverages consisting primarily of fruit, vegetables, oats, black beans, rice, coconut, almonds, soy beans and sesame seeds, not being milk substitutes and not for food purposes; non-alcoholic extracts, namely, rice extracts, black bean extracts, coconut extracts, almond extracts, sesame extracts, and oat extracts, for use in the preparation of fruit, vegetable, nut, grain, seed and bean-based beverages, namely, rice drinks, fruit drinks, bean drinks, oat drinks, and vegetable drinks, not being milk substitutes and not for food purposes; non-alcoholic juice beverages, namely, soy-based juices, rice-based juices not being milk substitutes, black bean juices, coconut juices, almond juice and juices made in substantial part of sesame seeds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vitasoy International Holdings Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Vitasoy International Holdings Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named VITASOY GO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 31, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2016 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 24, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |