Drawing for SKYWARD

USPTO serial 86443194

SKYWARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKYWARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patchen M. Haggerty

PATCHEN M HAGGERTY PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUESUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in enterprise flight management for drones and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 8, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 8, 2017RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Feb 9, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 17, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 13, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 23, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 23, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 25, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 25, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2015DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2015CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2015GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2015GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2015CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance