Drawing for BY CARRIER, SINCE 1971, TRADITION OF BUILDING EXCELLENCE

USPTO serial 86443363

BY CARRIER, SINCE 1971, TRADITION OF BUILDING EXCELLENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARHART, DAVID JAMES
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BY CARRIER, SINCE 1971, TRADITION OF BUILDING EXCELLENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GERALD ROMANOFF

GERALD ROMANOFF GERALD ROMANOFF, P.C.4 OCEANVIEW CTLONG BEACH, NY 11561-1164UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Building construction; Building construction and repair; Building construction information; Building construction observation, namely, static inspection, functional verification inspection, performance verification inspection; Building construction services; Building construction supervision; Building construction, remodeling and repair; Building damp-proofing; Building demolition; Building inspection; Construction and repair of buildings; Construction of buildings; General building contractor services; House building and repair; Maintenance and repair of buildings; Providing information in the field of home renovations and repairs; Repair of buildings; Repair work on buildings; Residential and commercial building constructionACTIVEApr 30, 1971

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 22, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance