USPTO serial 86443379
THE SETTLEMENT BUILDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE SETTLEMENT BUILDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trisha A. Doré
TRISHA A. DORÉ ACCUPRO TRADEMARK SERVICES LLP702 - 401 WEST GEORGIA STREETVANCOUVER, BC, V6B5A1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Operation of premises including leasing and management of buildings and space for a variety of retail shops; The operation of retail shopping centre and the retail sales of locally made food, beverages, art, textiles, jewelry, alcoholic beverages and general consumer merchandise | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |