USPTO serial 86444410
AMERICAN BOARD OF CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 22, 2016
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with AMERICAN BOARD OF CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGY INCORPORATED
Cape Canaveral, FL, US
Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN COLLEGE OF FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGY INCORPORATED
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGY INCORPORATED
Cape Canaveral, FL, US
Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN COLLEGE OF FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGY INCORPORATED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant Brim
Grant Brim BRIM LAW, LLC300 COLONIAL CENTER PKWY STE 100ROSWELL, GA 30076-4892United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Testing, analysis, and evaluation of physicians for the purpose of certification in functional neurology as it relates to childhood developmental disorders | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN COLLEGE OF FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGY INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN COLLEGE OF FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGY INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AMERICAN BOARD OF CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 22, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2015 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |