USPTO serial 86446087
Serial No. 86446087
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2018
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with Serial No. 86446087?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cheshire, CT
Cheshire, CT
Cheshire, CT
NORMAN, OK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy E. Miller
Wendy E. Miller Wissing Miller LLP31 Hudson Yards, 11th FloorIndustrious at Hudson YardsNew York, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software defined networking system, namely, optical communication and physical layer infrastructure equipment, products, and systems used in communication networks, namely, containerized equipment of racks, rows, and pods and their interconnects; interconnecting hardware for packet based routing and forwarding devices, namely, panels for patching, bulk cabling and harnesses, active cross connect devices; SDN (software defined networking) electrical and virtual machine-based controllers; switches, fiber optic switches, fiber optic switches with embedded intelligent connector and cable identifying technology, high density fiber optic switches, high density fiber optic switches with embedded intelligent connector and cable identifying technology, cross-connects being fiber optic cables, fiber optic cross-connects being fiber optic cables, fiber optic cross-connects being fiber optic cables with embedded intelligent connector and cable identifying technology, patch panels, namely, panels supporting networking ports, for housing interconnects of cables, fiber optic patch panels for housing interconnects of fiber optic cables, fiber optic patch panels for housing interconnects of fiber optic cables with embedded intelligent connector and cable identifying technology, computer software for monitoring, analyzing, operating, managing and maintaining communication networks, computer software for controlling route flows of data packets in communication networks, fiber optic cables and fiber optic cables with embedded intelligent cable identifying technology, fabrics of intelligent fiber optics and active optical switches, and computer software for remotely configuring and monitoring fabrics of intelligent fiber optics and active optical switches | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 24, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |