USPTO serial 86446851
LOOSE LEAF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIORELLI, JOANNA ELISA-HOLGUI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOOSE LEAF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Smiths Falls, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark N. Mutterperl
Mark N. Mutterperl Zeisler PLLC800 Third AvenueSuite 2800New York, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MEDICINAL HERB EXTRACTS; MEDICINAL HERBAL EXTRACTS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; MEDICINAL HERBAL PREPARATIONS; MEDICINAL HERBS; MEDICINAL HERBS IN DRIED OR PRESERVED FORM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |