Drawing for PLP

USPTO serial 86447330

PLP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerard M. Wissing

GERARD M. WISSING Wissing Miller LLP434 West 33rd Street, 12th FloorThe Lofts at Manhattan WestNew York, NY 10001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORKING SYSTEM, NAMELY, REMOTELY MANAGED AND CONFIGURED END TO END NETWORK COMMUNICATION PATH, composed of computer network optical switches, OPTICAL FABRICS, and PANELS; OPTICAL COMMUNICATION AND PHYSICAL LAYER INFRASTRUCTURE EQUIPMENT, PRODUCTS, AND SYSTEMS USED IN COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, NAMELY, containerized equipment of racks, rows, and pods and their interconnects; packet based routing and forwarding devices and their interconnecting hardware; SDN (software defined networking) controllers; SDN controllers having NFV (network function virtualization) functionality, computer network SWITCHES, FIBER OPTIC SWITCHES, FIBER OPTIC SWITCHES WITH EMBEDDED INTELLIGENT CONNECTOR AND CABLE IDENTIFYING TECHNOLOGY, HIGH DENSITY FIBER OPTIC SWITCHES, HIGH DENSITY FIBER OPTIC SWITCHES WITH EMBEDDED INTELLIGENT CONNECTOR AND CABLE IDENTIFYING TECHNOLOGY, CROSS-CONNECTS being fiber optic cables, FIBER OPTIC CROSS-CONNECTS being fiber optic cables, FIBER OPTIC CROSS-CONNECTS being fiber optic cables WITH EMBEDDED INTELLIGENT CONNECTOR AND CABLE IDENTIFYING TECHNOLOGY, PATCH PANELS for housing for housing interconnects of cables, FIBER OPTIC PATCH PANELS for housing for housing interconnects of fiber optic cables, FIBER OPTIC PATCH PANELS for housing interconnects of fiber optic cables WITH EMBEDDED INTELLIGENT CONNECTOR AND CABLE IDENTIFYING TECHNOLOGY, ROUTERS, FIBER OPTIC ROUTERS, FIBER OPTIC ROUTERS WITH EMBEDDED INTELLIGENT CONNECTOR AND CABLE IDENTIFYING TECHNOLOGY, electrical INTERCONNECT cables, FIBER MESH INTERCONNECT cables, network interface CARDS, network interface CARDS WITH EMBEDDED INTELLIGENT CONNECTOR AND CABLE IDENTIFYING TECHNOLOGY, SERVERS, computer SERVERS WITH EMBEDDED INTELLIGENT CONNECTOR AND CABLE IDENTIFYING TECHNOLOGY storage devices, namely, SCSI (small computer system interface)/SAN (storage area network) devices, Fiber Channel devices, Fiber Channel over Ethernet devices WITH EMBEDDED INTELLIGENT CONNECTOR AND CABLE IDENTIFYING TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MONITORING, ANALYZING, OPERATING, MANAGING AND MAINTAINING COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING ROUTE FLOWS OF DATA PACKETS IN COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, FIBER OPTIC CABLES AND FIBER OPTIC CABLES WITH EMBEDDED INTELLIGENT CABLE IDENTIFYING TECHNOLOGY, FABRICS OF INTELLIGENT FIBER OPTICS AND ACTIVE OPTICAL SWITCHES, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR REMOTELY CONFIGURING AND MONITORING FABRICS OF INTELLIGENT FIBER OPTICS AND ACTIVE OPTICAL SWITCHESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 9, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 3, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance