USPTO serial 86448151
PROJECT 42
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 17, 2017
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROJECT 42?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
East Syracuse, NY
East Syracuse, NY
East Syracuse, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew H Swyers Esq.
MATTHEW H SWYERS THE TRADEMARK COMPANY344 MAPLE AVE W #151VIENNA, VA 22180-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Physical fitness instruction | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 17, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 9, 2016 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |