CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GCH

USPTO serial 86448244

GCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jamie E. Platkin

JAMIE E. PLATKIN CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH ST FL 22HARTFORD, CT 06103-1253UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Services for providing food and beverages; providing temporary housing accommodations; making hotel reservations for others; hotel accommodation services; hotel services; services of a bar; services of a restaurant; providing hospitality services, namely, food and drink catering, serving food and drinks; restaurant services for consumption of prepared beverages and food; catering services within a disco or nightclubACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 8, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 22, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2014AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 11, 2014PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance