USPTO serial 86449733
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael T. Hess
MICHAEL T. HESS SEAGER, TUFTE & WICKHEM LLP100 SOUTH 5TH STREET, SUITE 600MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line trading services, namely, operating on-line marketplaces for sellers of goods and services; online trading services in which seller posts products to be offered for sale and bidding is done via the internet in order to facilitate the sale of goods and services by others via a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |