Drawing for C-FLOW

USPTO serial 86450192

C-FLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with C-FLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M. Abel

SALLY M. ABEL FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-1990UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Consulting services in the field of IT financial managementACTIVE
042Consulting in the field of IT project management; computer project management services; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for communications and project management; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for facilitating electronic communication for operational efficiency, business management, change management, project management; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring of network systems, servers, web, and database applications and notification of related events and alerts; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring, reporting, and analysis of project developments, changes, and status; design, planning, implementation, and project management services in the field of IT infrastructure and financial management and related consulting servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 13, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jul 13, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 5, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 5, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 5, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 5, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 5, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 5, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 5, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 5, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 5, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jan 5, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 10, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 10, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 21, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 5, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 1, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 4, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 3, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 3, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 19, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Nov 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 13, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance