Drawing for NOT SO TALL

USPTO serial 86452300

NOT SO TALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOT SO TALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna L. Mirman

DONNA L MIRMAN GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Belts; button down shirts; camouflage jackets; cargo pants; dress pants; dress shirts; hooded sweatshirts; jackets; jeans; pajama bottoms; pajamas; pants; polo shirts; raincoats; scarves; shirts; socks; suits; sweaters; sweatpants; T-shirts; tiesACTIVENov 20, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 3, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 3, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 23, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 27, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2017CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Feb 8, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 8, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 8, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 1, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 11, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2016CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 22, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 9, 2015IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 9, 2015EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 9, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 14, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance