USPTO serial 86453426
RMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 2016
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with RMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Akron, OH, US
Akron, OH, US
Cuyahoga Falls, OH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Natalie A. Ward
Natalie A. Ward SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.2555 Grand Blvd.Intellectual Property DepartmentKansas City, MO 64108Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machinery systems, namely, extrusion systems for the rubber industry and tire assembly equipment comprised primarily of extrusion machines for rubber and tires, and conveyors; tire building machines, namely, a series of machined for assembling tires in successive stages; embossing machines; rubber cutting machines; rubber refining machines; boosters, namely, machines for applying accelerants into rubber vulcanizing apparatus; vulcanizers, namely, rubber vulcanizing apparatus; rubber washing machines for use in industry; cementing machines, namely, rubber bonding machines; adhesive machines, namely, industrial machines for applying and dispensing adhesives in manufacturing; rubber strainers, namely, machines for separating target rubber materials from mixtures of materials; [ rubber grinding machines; ] rubber extruders namely, extrusion machines for rubber; machine parts, namely, rollers coated with synthetic material; machine parts, namely, molds for use in the manufacture of rubber and tires; assembly line conveyor machinery, namely, feeders; machine parts for extrusion machines for rubber, namely, extruder heads; rubber extrusion dies for use with machine tools; roller dies for use with machine tools; machine parts for rubber manufacturing machines, namely, roller heads | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1919 |
| 040 | Manufacturing for others in the field of rubber extrusion systems and tire assembly equipment, namely, extrusion systems for the rubber industry and tire assembly equipment, tire building machines, [ embossing machines, rubber cutting machines, rubber refining machines, superheaters, boosters, vulcanizers, rubber washing machines, ] cementing machines, [ adhesive machines, rubber strainers, ] rubber grinding machines, rubber extruders, [ rollers, molds, feeders, ] extruder heads, rubber extrusion dies [, roller dies, roller heads ] | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1919 |
| 042 | Designing and development of rubber extrusion systems and tire assembly equipment, namely, extrusion systems for the rubber industry and tire assembly equipment, tire building machines, [ embossing machines, rubber cutting machines, rubber refining machines, superheaters, boosters, vulcanizers, rubber washing machines, ] cementing machines, [ adhesive machines, rubber strainers, ] rubber grinding machines, rubber extruders, [ rollers, molds, feeders, ] extruder heads, rubber extrusion dies [, roller dies, roller heads ] | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1919 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RMS Equipment, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RMS Equipment, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RMS Equipment, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | PUM2 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU2 | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |