Drawing for METAPLEX

USPTO serial 86456172

METAPLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METAPLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith Barritt

KEITH BARRITT FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.PO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009middleware software for storing, accessing, processing, disseminating, and managing digital objects, which are data structures whose principal components are digital material plus a unique identifier for this material and other information pertaining to the dataABANDONED—
035data processing services, namely, processing of digital objects, which are data structures whose principal components are digital material plus a unique identifier for this material and other information pertaining to the dataABANDONED—
042electronic storage of digital objects, which are data structures whose principal components are digital material plus a unique identifier for this material and other information pertaining to the data; computer services, namely, computer network-based registration, identification, and other information management services for digital objects, which are data structures whose principal components are digital material plus a unique identifier for this material and other information pertaining to the dataABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2019MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 1, 2019ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2019EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 13, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 13, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 8, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 15, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 10, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 5, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 20, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 8, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance