Drawing for COLLABORATION STATION

USPTO serial 86458735

COLLABORATION STATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAGLINI, KAREN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COLLABORATION STATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew H. Swyers

MATTHEW H. SWYERS THE TRADEMARK COMPANY344 MAPLE AVE W PMB 151VIENNA, VA 22180-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer docking stations; Electronic docking stationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 18, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance