USPTO serial 86459079
EVOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dorian B. Kennedy
DORIAN B KENNEDY BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ PC3414 PEACHTREE RD NESTE 1600ATLANTA, GA 30326-1164Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparel in the nature of scrub tops, scrub pants, scrub caps for use in medical examination and treatment; Medical treatment apparel; Patient examination gowns | ACTIVE | May 30, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |