USPTO serial 86459175
WETEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WETEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Furr
JEFFREY M. FURR Furr Law Firm2622 DeBolt RdUtica, OH 43080-9604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer peripherals; software for computers and other electronic devices, namely, software for Set-Top Box, software for devices for record and reproduce texts, images, audio and video, software for Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, use in software storage of data, use in electronic storage of data; computer software for personalized interactive television programming; mobile Phones; smartphones; tablet PC; computers; notebook computers; netbooks; equipment, instruments and devices for record and reproduce texts, images, audio and video; IPTV OTT management Hardware and Software; Set Top Boxes; GPS navigation devices; Video Cameras; Home Entertainment Center, namely, media center, namely, DVD player, media player, multimedia devices, television; Computer Joystick; Gamepad | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2016 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |