USPTO serial 86459854
OCEAN BASKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OCEAN BASKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl L. Burbach
CHERYL L. BURBACH HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 MASTIN ST STE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210-1697UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish, not live; poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams; eggs, milk; edible oils and fats; Milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services; take-away fast food services; cafes; bars; restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OCEAN BASKET HOLDINGS (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by OCEAN BASKET HOLDINGS (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named OCEAN BASKET
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | ISPO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| May 12, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |