Drawing for PROJECT BTC

USPTO serial 86461884

PROJECT BTC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROJECT BTC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew D. Price

ANDREW D. PRICE VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Charitable services, namely, promoting education reform by coordinating the creation of a network of financial donors for the purpose of matching donors with nonprofit organizations and causes in the field of education reformACTIVE—
045Providing information, an online database, and information clearinghouse in the field of education reform featuring voter data information to education reform groups for the purpose of supporting issue advocacy in the field of education reform; services to support and advance education reform, namely, compilation and conducting analysis of individual voter data for education reform groups to support issue advocacy in the field of education reformACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 11, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 9, 2016PBSRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Feb 29, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 29, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 25, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 24, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 6, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 24, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 6, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 5, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 2, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 27, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 15, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 15, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 14, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance