USPTO serial 86462360
DJDJ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE RISO, LOKSYE GEORGIANA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DJDJ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stone Mountain, GA
Stone Mountain, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy Peterson
Wendy Peterson Not Just Patents LLC1248 Victoria St NSt. Paul, MN 55117UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcasting programs via a global computer network; Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to films and television programmes provided via a video-on-demand service; Broadcasting services, namely, transmission of advertising programs and media advertising communications via digital communications networks; Communication services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, visual images and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks; Digital network telecommunications services; Electronic order transmission services; Electronic transmission and streaming of digital media content for others via global and local computer networks; Electronic transmission for others of securities and financial information via computer linking services, namely, communicating and routing trade information involving orders, entry and execution services, to others via a global computer network; Information transmission services via digital networks; Information transmission via electronic communications networks; Peer-to-peer network computer services, namely, electronic transmission of audio, video and other data and documents among computers; Providing an on-line forum for companies to showcase, display, demonstrate and promote new and innovative ideas, products and services in the convention or meeting management arena; Providing telecommunication connectivity services for transfer of images, messages, audio, visual, audiovisual and multimedia works; Simulcasting broadcast television over global communication networks, the Internet and wireless networks; Television and radio broadcasting services; Transmission of messages; Transmission of news; Video broadcasting and transmission services via the Internet, featuring films and movies; Wireless broadcasting; Wireless communications services, namely, transmission of graphics to mobile telephones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |